United States v. Peay ( 1999 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7519
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LINDA MITCHELL PEAY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,
District Judge. (CR-90-89-G, CR-90-109-WS)
Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 30, 1999
Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Linda Mitchell Peay, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin H. White, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Linda Mitchell Peay appeals the district court’s order dis-
missing her motion for reduction of her term of imprisonment pur-
suant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West Supp. 1999). We have re-
viewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no re-
versible error. Accordingly, we deny Peay’s motion for appointment
of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
United States v. Peay, Nos. CR-90-89-G; CR-90-109-01-WS (M.D.N.C.
Sept. 29, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2