Butchie Stemple v. Bobby Shearin ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 15-6216
    BUTCHIE J. STEMPLE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    BOBBY P. SHEARIN,     Warden;   KEITH   K.   ARNOLD,   Chief;   KEVIN
    LAMP, Chaplain,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.    Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge.
    (1:14-cv-01739-ELH)
    Submitted:   June 30, 2015                     Decided:    July 29, 2015
    Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Butchie J. Stemple, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-
    Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for
    Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Butchie   J.   Stemple      appeals   the   district   court’s   order
    granting summary judgment to Appellees on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
    (2012)   claims.    We    have    reviewed   the   record   and   find   no
    reversible error.     Accordingly, we deny Stemple’s motion for
    appointment of counsel and affirm substantially on the reasoning
    of the district court. *      Stemple v. Shearin, No.       1:14-cv-01739-
    ELH (D. Md. Feb. 3, 2015).            We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
    in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    * Although Stemple’s claim for equitable relief may not have
    been barred by Appellees’ qualified immunity, see Wall v. Wade,
    
    741 F.3d 492
    , 497 n.9 (4th Cir. 2014) (noting that qualified
    immunity is inapplicable to claims for equitable relief), we
    conclude that the claim nevertheless fails on the merits.     See
    Republican Party of N.C. v. Martin, 
    980 F.2d 943
    , 952 (4th Cir.
    1992) (“[W]e may affirm a judgment for any reason appearing on
    the record.”).      See generally 
    Wall, 741 F.3d at 498-99
    (providing test for determining when prison policy violates
    First Amendment).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-6216

Judges: Niemeyer, Duncan, Hamilton

Filed Date: 7/29/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024