United States v. Joyner , 158 F. App'x 478 ( 2005 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 05-7032
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    JERJUAN DEVULA JOYNER,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Spartanburg.   Margaret B. Seymour, District
    Judge. (CR-02-325; CA-04-2346-7)
    Submitted: December 15, 2005              Decided: December 21, 2005
    Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Jerjuan Devula Joyner, Appellant Pro Se.       Alan Lance Crick,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Jerjuan    Devula       Joyner   seeks    to   appeal    the    district
    court’s order dismissing his petition filed under 
    28 U.S.C. § 2255
    (2000).     An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a §
    2255   proceeding     unless    a    circuit   justice      or   judge     issues    a
    certificate of appealability.           
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1) (2000).               A
    certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial
    showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”                          
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2)   (2000).       A    prisoner   satisfies      this    standard      by
    demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that the
    district    court’s    assessment       of   his     constitutional      claims     is
    debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural rulings by
    the district court are also debatable or wrong.                  See Miller-El v.
    Cockrell, 
    537 U.S. 322
    , 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683 (4th Cir. 2001).
    We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Joyner
    has not made the requisite showing.            See United States v. Morris,
    F. 3d     , No. 04-7889 (4th Cir. Nov. 7, 2005).              Accordingly, we
    deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.                         We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-7032

Citation Numbers: 158 F. App'x 478

Judges: Michael, Duncan, Hamilton

Filed Date: 12/21/2005

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024