Timothy Finley v. Oshun Hinton ( 2011 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1431
TIMOTHY E. FINLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TIMOTHY M. CONROY, Narcotics Detective, in his individual
and official capacity; BOBBY CARIAS, Narcotics Detective, in
his individual and official capacity; DAVE M. HENDERSON,
Captain, in his individual and official capacity; WILLIE L.
JOHNSON, Chief of Police, in his individual and official
capacity; WILLIAM D. RICHARDSON; OSHUN CYRUS HINTON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (6:11-00196-HFF-KFM)
Submitted: August 18, 2011 Decided: August 22, 2011
Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy E. Finley, Appellant Pro Se. O. Cyrus Hinton, O. CYRUS
HINTON LAW OFFICES, Rock Hill, South Carolina; William D.
Richardson, Easley, South Carolina; Appellees Pro Se; Nathaniel
Heyward Clarkson, III, Amy Miller Snyder, CLARKSON WALSH TERRELL
& COULTER, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Timothy E. Finley seeks to appeal the district court
order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation
and dismissing without prejudice two Defendants. This court may
exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291(2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial
Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order
Finley seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3