Pramco II, LLC v. Kissi ( 2009 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1413
PRAMCO II, LLC; EMIL HIRSCH; O’CONNOR & HANNAN, LLP,
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
v.
DAVID M. KISSI, Individually and in his capacity as Co-
Trustee of the Ammendale Living Trust,
Defendant – Appellant,
and
EDITH TRUVILLION KISSI; AMMENDALE LIVING TRUST,
Defendants,
DAVID MUCHOW,
Respondent,
CHRISTOPHER BOWMAR MEAD; RICHARD M. KREMEN; JOSE ANDRADE;
DLA PIPER US LLP; ROBERT ERIC GREENBERG,
Parties-in-Interest,
AMMENDALE LIVING TRUST,
Garnishee,
v.
MICHAEL PEARSON; BENNETT AND BAIR, LLP,
Movants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:03-cv-02241-PJM)
Submitted: November 19, 2009 Decided: December 1, 2009
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David M. Kissi, Appellant Pro Se. Emil Hirsch, James Patrick
Ryan, NOSSAMAN, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
David M. Kissi seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying without prejudice the plaintiffs’ motion to reopen
the underlying proceedings. This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006),
and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Kissi seeks to
appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory
or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for
lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
3