Flores-Rosales v. GEO Group Inc ( 2006 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 06-7214
    RUBEN FLORES-ROSALES,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    THE GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED, at Rivers
    Correctional   Institution;   J.   ALEXANDER,
    Correctional Counselor at Rivers Correctional
    Institution,
    Defendants,
    and
    MRS. VANN, Sargeant at Rivers Correctional
    Institution; MR. WATERFIELD, Sargeant at
    Rivers Correctional Institution; D. TANN,
    Correctional Officer at Rivers Correctional
    Institution; MR. PURNELL, Correctional Officer
    at Rivers Correctional Institution; RIVERS
    CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior
    District Judge. (5:04-ct-000623-H)
    Submitted: December 14, 2006              Decided:   December 20, 2006
    Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Ruben Flores-Rosales, Appellant Pro Se. James Redfern Morgan, Jr.,
    WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North
    Carolina; Mark Allen Davis, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE,
    PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    - 2 -
    PER CURIAM:
    Ruben Flores-Rosales appeals the district court’s order
    denying relief on his Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed.
    Bureau of Narcotics, 
    403 U.S. 388
     (1971) action.   We have reviewed
    the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court.     See Flores-Rosales v. GEO
    Group, Inc., 5:04-ct-000623-H (E.D.N.C. filed Nov. 22, 2004 &
    entered Dec. 8, 2004; June 7, 2006).       We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid in the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    - 3 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-7214

Filed Date: 12/20/2006

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014