In re: Van Wagner v. ( 1996 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-8115
In Re: GEORGE H. VAN WAGNER, III,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-92-200-BR)
Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 29, 1996
Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George H. Van Wagner, III, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
George Van Wagner, a federal prisoner, brought this petition
for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the district court to grant
his motion to proceed pro se in a multi-party 42 U.S.C. § 1983(1988) civil action. Specifically, he seeks an order directing the
district court to allow him to proceed pro se or with paid counsel
of his choosing.
The district court originally denied Van Wagner's motion
because of the confusion and delay that would develop at this
advanced stage of the proceedings. However, upon learning new
information concerning Van Wagner's financial ability, the court
reconsidered its previous order and granted Van Wagner's request to
proceed pro se or hire an attorney with his own funds. Because the
issue has been resolved, the petition is moot.
Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis but
deny the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2