United States v. Perez ( 1997 )

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2268 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus AUGUSTINE PEREZ, Claimant - Appellant, and $15,716.00 IN U. S. CURRENCY, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Lynchburg. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-90-4-L) Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 24, 1997 Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Augustine Perez, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration of the order granting forfeiture of Appellant's property. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Perez, No. CA-90-4-L (W.D. Va. Sept. 3, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2