United States v. Johnnie C. Gore ( 1999 )


Menu:
  • UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.                                                                    No. 99-4321
    JOHNNIE CLEVELAND GORE,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
    Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge.
    (CR-98-187)
    Submitted: December 14, 1999
    Decided: December 29, 1999
    Before LUTTIG and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and
    HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    _________________________________________________________________
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    _________________________________________________________________
    COUNSEL
    B. Thomas Reed, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Helen F. Fahey,
    United States Attorney, Darryl J. Mitchell, Assistant United States
    Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
    _________________________________________________________________
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See
    Local Rule 36(c).
    OPINION
    PER CURIAM:
    Johnnie Cleveland Gore pled guilty to possession of a firearm by
    a convicted felon in violation of 
    18 U.S.C.A. § 922
    (g)(1) (West Supp.
    1999) and was sentenced to 96 months of imprisonment. On appeal,
    Gore objects to the district court's assignment of criminal history
    points pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4A1.2(c)(1)
    (1998) for misdemeanor convictions on which Gore had received a
    jail sentence suspended upon one year good behavior.
    This Court reviews questions involving the legal interpretations of
    the Sentencing Guidelines de novo. See United States v. Wessells, 
    936 F.2d 165
    , 168 (4th Cir. 1991). Section 4A1.2(c) of the United States
    Sentencing Guidelines Manual instructs a district court to count sen-
    tences for misdemeanors "if (A) the sentence was a term of probation
    of at least one year or a term of imprisonment of at least thirty days,
    or (B) the prior offense was similar to an instant offense." USSG
    § 4A1.2(c)(1).
    In each case where Gore received a suspended sentence, the court
    conditioned the suspension on Gore's good behavior for a term of one
    year. The condition of good behavior "constitutes the origin and pur-
    pose of the suspension and probation statutes." Marshall v.
    Commonwealth, 
    116 S.E.2d 270
    , 273 (Va. 1960). Such a condition is
    the equivalent of a one-year term of unsupervised probation and
    countable under USSG § 4A1.2(c)(1). The district court was correct
    to include points for Gore's suspended sentences in calculating his
    criminal history under the Sentencing Guidelines.
    Accordingly, we affirm Gore's sentence. Because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    Court and argument would not aid the decisional process, we grant
    Gore's motion to submit this case for decision on the briefs.
    AFFIRMED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 99-4321

Filed Date: 12/29/1999

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014