United States v. Hazel ( 1997 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 97-7064
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    BOBBY HAZEL,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
    trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CR-93-62-A, CA-97-633-AM)
    Submitted:     November 12, 1997        Decided:     December 11, 1997
    Before WIDENER, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Bobby Hazel, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Philip Rosenberg, OFFICE OF
    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his
    motion filed under 
    28 U.S.C. § 2255
     (1994) (current version at 
    28 U.S.C.A. § 2255
     (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the
    record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. United States v. Hazel, Nos. CR-93-62-A; CA-97-633-AM (E.D.
    Va. July 14, 1997). See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 
    1997 WL 338568
     (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). Appellant's motion to
    withdraw his previous motion seeking a stay of the informal brief-
    ing order is granted. Appellant's two motions seeking a stay of the
    appellate proceedings or an enlargement of time are denied. We dis-
    pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 97-7064

Filed Date: 12/11/1997

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014