Emmanuela Obi v. Virginia State University ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 13-1047
    EMMANUELA OBI,
    Plaintiff – Appellant,
    v.
    VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY,
    Defendant - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.     John A. Gibney, Jr.,
    District Judge. (3:12-cv-00825-JAG)
    Submitted:   February 21, 2013               Decided:    March 27, 2013
    Before AGEE and     DAVIS,   Circuit   Judges,   and   HAMILTON,   Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Emmanuela Obi, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Emmanuela      Obi    appeals       the      district    court’s      order
    dismissing      Obi’s    civil    action       without    prejudice. *       We    have
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.                      Accordingly,
    we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.                        Obi v.
    Virginia State Univ., No. 3:12-cv-00825-JAG (E.D. Va. Jan. 2,
    2013).     We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal    contentions     are     adequately      presented      in   the   materials
    before   this    court    and    argument      would     not   aid   the   decisional
    process.
    AFFIRMED
    *
    Generally, orders dismissing complaints without prejudice
    are interlocutory and not appealable.     Domino Sugar Corp. v.
    Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 
    10 F.3d 1064
    , 1066-67 (4th Cir.
    1993).   However, orders dismissing actions or cases in their
    entirety without prejudice generally are appealable.     Chao v.
    Rivendell Woods, Inc., 
    415 F.3d 342
    , 345 (4th Cir. 2005).     We
    find that the district court’s order is an appealable order
    because the action was dismissed in its entirety and the
    district court’s order indicates that “amendment of [Obi’s]
    complaint would not permit [her] to continue the litigation in
    the district court.” 
    Id.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-1047

Judges: Agee, Davis, Hamilton, Per Curiam

Filed Date: 3/27/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024