Anthony Williams v. United States ( 2012 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7365
ANTHONY WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Formally sued as Rodney Blacknall
ATF Agent; Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
Bureau,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 12-7381
ANTHONY WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
OFFICER BRIGGS, Officer, CMPD, sued individually and in
their official capacity; ROBERT J. WISE, Officer, CMPD,
sued individually and in their official capacity; CHIP R.
BUSKER, Sergeant, CMPD, sued individually and in their
official capacity; KYLE J. O'DELL, Officer, CMPD, sued
individually and in their official capacity; J. E.
HARTNESS, Officer, CMPD, sued individually and in their
official capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 12-7386
ANTHONY WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
RICK F. HETZEL, SBI Agent, North Carolina State Bureau of
Investigation,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad,
Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:11-cv-00594-RJC; 3:12-cv-00097-
RJC; 3:11-cv-00443-RJC)
Submitted: December 13, 2012 Decided: December 20, 2012
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Bradford Taylor, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina;
Richard Rustin Perlungher, CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG POLICE
DEPARTMENT, Charlotte, North Carolina; Angel Evon Gray, Jennifer
Joy Strickland, Assistant Attorneys General, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Williams appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaints related
to his 2002 arrest and 2003 conviction and denying his motions
for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Williams v. United States, No.
3:11-cv-00594-RJC (W.D.N.C. June 11, 2012); Williams v. Briggs,
No. 3:12-cv-00097-RJC (W.D.N.C. May 31 & Aug. 6, 2012);
Williams v. Hetzel, No. 3:11-cv-00443-RJC (W.D.N.C. July 3 &
Aug. 6, 2012). We grant Williams’ motion to substitute brief.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3