In Re: Mykal Ryan , 459 F. App'x 290 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                                UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 11-2079
    IN RE:   MYKAL S. RYAN; HELEN E. RYAN; JOHN J. RYAN, JR,
    Petitioners.
    On Petition for a Writ of Mandamus.
    (08-50805-FJS; 10-05026-FJS)
    Submitted:   December 20, 2011               Decided:   December 22, 2011
    Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Mykal S. Ryan, Helen E. Ryan, John J. Ryan, Jr., Petitioners Pro
    Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Mykal S. Ryan, Helen E. Ryan, and John J. Ryan, Jr.,
    petition      for   a    writ   of    mandamus       and    other    injunctive         relief
    seeking        an       order        from      this         court         directing        the
    disqualification/recusal of the bankruptcy court judge presiding
    over    the    underlying       bankruptcy        proceeding,        as    well    as   other
    relief.       We conclude that the Ryans are not entitled to mandamus
    relief.
    Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used
    only    in    extraordinary        circumstances.            Kerr    v.    United       States
    Dist.     Court,      
    426 U.S. 394
    ,   402     (1976);        United       States      v.
    Moussaoui,      
    333 F.3d 509
    ,    516-17       (4th    Cir.    2003).         Further,
    mandamus      relief     is    available      only    when    the    petitioner         has   a
    clear right to the relief sought.                    In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan
    Ass’n, 
    860 F.2d 135
    , 138 (4th Cir. 1988).
    The relief sought by the Ryans is not available by way
    of mandamus.            Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of
    mandamus.       We deny the Ryans’ motion for injunctive relief, and
    we   dispense       with    oral     argument     because      the    facts       and   legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    PETITION DENIED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-2079

Citation Numbers: 459 F. App'x 290

Judges: Motz, Duncan, Diaz

Filed Date: 12/22/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024