Zheng v. Mukasey , 303 F. App'x 160 ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •                                 UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 08-1355
    YAN ZHENG,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
    Appeals.
    Submitted:     December 8, 2008               Decided:   December 18, 2008
    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Henry Zhang, ZHANG & ASSOCIATES, P.C., New York, New York, for
    Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, M.
    Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Rebecca Hoffberg,
    OFFICE   OF  IMMIGRATION  LITIGATION,  Washington,  D.C.,  for
    Respondent.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Yan Zheng, a native and citizen of China, petitions
    for    review     of     an    order    of   the    Board     of    Immigration       Appeals
    affirming the Immigration Judge’s denial of her applications for
    relief from removal.
    Zheng    first     challenges        the    determination        that     she
    failed to establish eligibility for asylum.                          To obtain reversal
    of    a   determination         denying      eligibility       for    relief,    an     alien
    “must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that
    no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear
    of persecution.”               INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 
    502 U.S. 478
    , 483-84
    (1992).         We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude
    that Zheng fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary
    result.         Having failed to qualify for asylum, Zheng cannot meet
    the more stringent standard for withholding of removal.                               Chen v.
    INS, 
    195 F.3d 198
    , 205 (4th Cir. 1999); INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca,
    
    480 U.S. 421
    , 430 (1987).                Finally, we uphold the finding below
    that Zheng failed to demonstrate that it is more likely than not
    that      she    would    be    tortured     if     removed    to    China.      
    8 C.F.R. § 1208.16
    (c)(2) (2008).
    Accordingly,       we   deny       the   petition     for     review.      We
    dispense        with     oral     argument        because     the     facts     and     legal
    2
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    PETITION DENIED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-1355

Citation Numbers: 303 F. App'x 160

Judges: Wilkinson, Niemeyer, Shedd

Filed Date: 12/18/2008

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024