United States v. Shifflett ( 2000 )

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-4269 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MICHAEL RAY SHIFFLETT, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James H. Michael, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-91-33) Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 20, 2000 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Ray Shifflett, Appellant Pro Se. Jennie M. Waering, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Michael Shifflett appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to extend the stay of forfeiture on two parcels of land. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Shifflett’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Shifflett, No. CR-91-33 (W.D. Va. Apr. 1, 1999). We deny Shifflett’s motions requesting tran- scripts and to enlarge the record. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2