Therese Vanguere v. Eric Holder, Jr. ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 12-1122
    THERESE VANGUERE,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
    Appeals.
    Submitted:   June 28, 2012                  Decided:   July 13, 2012
    Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Therese Vanguere, Petitioner Pro Se. Todd J. Cochran, Office of
    Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
    Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Therese Vanguere, a native and citizen of the Central
    African      Republic,        petitions      for     review       of    the    Board       of
    Immigration      Appeals’       (“Board”)        order    denying       her   motion       to
    reopen immigration proceedings.                  In her pro se pleadings in this
    court, Vanguere has failed to raise any arguments responsive to
    the Board’s reasoning for denying her motion to reopen.                             See 4th
    Cir. R. 34(b) (directing appealing parties to present specific
    arguments in an informal brief and stating that this court’s
    review on appeal is limited to the issues raised in the informal
    brief);      Yousefi    v.    INS,    
    260 F.3d 318
    ,     326      (4th   Cir.    2001)
    (stating failure to raise an issue in an opening brief results
    in   abandonment       of    that    issue).        We    therefore      conclude         that
    Vanguere has forfeited appellate review of the sole order that
    is the subject of this petition for review.                             Accordingly, we
    deny   the    petition       for    review   for    the     reasons      stated      by   the
    Board.     See In re: Vanguere (B.I.A. Dec. 28, 2011).                        We further
    deny the pending motion for the appointment of counsel.                                    We
    dispense      with     oral     argument      because       the     facts     and     legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    PETITION DENIED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-1122

Judges: Motz, Wynn, Diaz

Filed Date: 7/13/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024