United States v. Ekere Inyangette , 502 F. App'x 310 ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 12-7604
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    EKERE   INYANGETTE,   a/k/a    Michael      Thomas,    a/k/a   Uduak
    Inyangette,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.   Liam O’Grady, District
    Judge. (1:09-cr-00260-LO-1)
    Submitted:   December 18, 2012              Decided:   December 28, 2012
    Before AGEE, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Ekere Inyangette, Appellant Pro Se.     Andrew Lamont Creighton,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia,
    Dennis Michael Fitzpatrick, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
    ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Ekere Inyangette seeks to appeal his conviction and
    132-month sentence following his guilty plea to one count of
    possession    with   intent   to   distribute   five   grams   or   more   of
    cocaine base, in violation of 
    21 U.S.C. § 841
    (a)(1) (2006).                We
    dismiss the appeal.
    In criminal cases, a defendant must file his notice of
    appeal within fourteen days after the entry of judgment. 1             Fed.
    R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A)(i).          With or without a motion, upon a
    showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court
    may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of
    appeal.   Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 
    759 F.2d 351
    , 353 (4th Cir. 1985).
    The district court entered the criminal judgment on
    October 26, 2009.       Inyangette filed his notice of appeal on
    September 13, 2012. 2    Because Inyangette failed to file a timely
    notice of appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period, we
    1
    At the time judgment was entered, the appeal period was
    ten days. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A)(i) (2008). On December 1,
    2009, the period was extended to fourteen days. Fed. R. App. P.
    4(b)(1)(A)(i) (2009). Inyangette’s notice of appeal is untimely
    under either period.
    2
    For purposes of this appeal, we assume that the date
    appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could
    have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to
    the district court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 
    487 U.S. 266
    , 276 (1988).
    2
    dismiss the appeal. 3       We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts    and   legal    contentions    are   adequately   presented     in   the
    materials      before   this   court   and   argument   would   not    aid   the
    decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    3
    We note that the appeal period in a criminal case is not a
    jurisdictional provision, but rather a claim-processing rule.
    Bowles v. Russell, 
    551 U.S. 205
    , 209-14 (2007); United States v.
    Urutyan, 
    564 F.3d 679
    , 685 (4th Cir. 2009). However, because
    Inyangette’s appeal is inordinately late, and its consideration
    is not in the best interest of judicial economy, we exercise our
    inherent power to dismiss it.     United States v. Mitchell, 
    518 F.3d 740
    , 744, 750 (10th Cir. 2008).
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-7604

Citation Numbers: 502 F. App'x 310

Judges: Agee, Davis, Diaz, Per Curiam

Filed Date: 12/28/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024