Mark Ivan Bedford v. Richard A. Young George Deeds Maggie Watkins Susie Cox , 70 F.3d 1260 ( 1995 )
Menu:
-
70 F.3d 1260
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Mark Ivan BEDFORD, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Richard A. YOUNG; George Deeds; Maggie Watkins; Susie
Cox, Defendants--Appellees.No. 95-6308.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Dec. 5, 1995.
Mark Ivan Bedford, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bedford v. Young, No. CA-95-79-R (W.D.Va. Jan. 31, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Document Info
Docket Number: 95-6308
Citation Numbers: 70 F.3d 1260, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 38765
Filed Date: 12/5/1995
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021