Caldwell v. Town of Cary ( 2002 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 02-1871
    EMMETT W. CALDWELL,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    TOWN OF CARY POLICE DEPARTMENT; RANDALL
    SWALLOW, Cary Police Officer; STEVEN WILKINS,
    Cary Police Officer; JERRY MCCORMICK, Cary
    Police Officer; TOWN OF CARY; GREGORY RAMAGE,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    No. 02-7066
    EMMETT W. CALDWELL,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    S. D. WILKINS, Cary Police Officer; OFFICER
    SPARROW, Cary Police Officer; TOWN OF CARY,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.   W. Earl Britt, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-02-178-7-BR, CA-01-274-5-BR)
    Submitted:   November 21, 2002         Decided:   December 11, 2002
    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Emmett W. Caldwell, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Allen Doyle, Jennifer
    Susan Jerzak, HEDRICK, EATMAN, GARDNER & KINCHELOE, Raleigh, North
    Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    2
    PER CURIAM:
    Emmett W. Caldwell appeals the district court’s orders denying
    relief on his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     (2000) complaints.      We have reviewed
    the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court.      See Caldwell v. Town of Cary
    Police Dep’t, No. CA-02-178-7-BR (E.D.N.C. July 11, 2002); Caldwell
    v. Wilkins, No. CA-01-274-5-BR (E.D.N.C. filed May 10, 2002 &
    entered May 13, 2002; filed July 10, 2002 & entered July 17, 2002).
    Caldwell’s request for additional time to file a supplemental
    informal brief is denied.     We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
    materials   before   the   court   and   argument   would   not   aid   the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-1871

Filed Date: 12/11/2002

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014