Liahben v. Osteen ( 2009 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7360
CLIFFORD LIAHBEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR., in his individual and official
capacity as a practicing attorney in the law firm Adam and
Osteen; MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, in his official capacity and his
individual capacity as U.S. Attorney General; ANNA MILLS
WAGONER, in her official capacity and her individual
capacity as United States Attorney for the Middle District
of North Carolina; AULD, in his individual and official
capacity as United States Attorney for the Middle District
of North Carolina; JOHN W. STONE, JR., in his official
capacity and individual capacity as Assistant U.S. Attorney
Press Officer; CARTER CATLET, in his individual and official
capacity United States Secret Service Agent; MIKE SAUNDERS,
in his individual and official capacity as Detective for
Winston Salem P.D.; S. W. TOLLEY, in his individual and
official capacity as Detective for the Winston Salem P.D.;
DEBORAH MCCLAREN, in her official and individual capacity as
Detective for Triad Municipal A.B.C. Law Enforcement; DAVID
B. FREEDMAN, in his individual and official capacity as a
practicing attorney in the law firm of Crumpler Freedman
Parker and Witt; VINCENT FRANK RABIL, in his individual and
official capacity as a practicing attorney in the law firm
of Crumpler Freedman and Witt; SERGEANT BARTMAN, in his
individual and official capacity as an officer of the High
Bridge P.D.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-00226-NCT-PTS)
Submitted: December 15, 2009 Decided: December 18, 2009
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clifford Liahben, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Clifford Liahben appeals the district court’s order
adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing as frivolous Liahben’s action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2006), Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau
of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and the civil RICO statute. *
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Liahben v. Osteen, No. 1:09-cv-00226-NCT-PTS (M.D.N.C.
June 29, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
“Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations” Act, 18
U.S.C. § 1964 (2006).
3