Johnson v. Cartledge , 359 F. App'x 400 ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 09-7844
    JOHNNIE L. JOHNSON,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    LEROY CARTLEDGE, Acting Warden,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Rock Hill.     G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (0:08-cv-02071-GRA)
    Submitted:    December 17, 2009             Decided:   December 31, 2009
    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Johnnie L. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.      Donald John Zelenka,
    Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Johnnie      L.     Johnson        seeks     to       appeal       the    district
    court’s    order       accepting        the     recommendation         of     the       magistrate
    judge     and    denying         relief     on    his     
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
           (2006)
    petition.        The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice
    or    judge     issues      a    certificate         of   appealability.                
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1) (2006).               A certificate of appealability will not
    issue     absent       “a       substantial       showing        of    the        denial       of    a
    constitutional         right.”            
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2)           (2006).           A
    prisoner        satisfies          this        standard        by     demonstrating               that
    reasonable       jurists         would     find      that      any     assessment            of     the
    constitutional         claims      by     the    district        court    is      debatable          or
    wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district
    court is likewise debatable.                      Miller-El v. Cockrell, 
    537 U.S. 322
    , 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484 (2000);
    Rose v. Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).                                           We have
    independently reviewed the record and conclude that Johnson has
    not     made    the    requisite          showing.          Accordingly,            we       deny    a
    certificate       of     appealability           and      dismiss      the        appeal.            We
    dispense        with    oral       argument       because        the     facts       and          legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-7844

Citation Numbers: 359 F. App'x 400

Judges: Wilkinson, Niemeyer, Agee

Filed Date: 12/31/2009

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024