Hunnicutt v. VA Dept Corrections ( 2004 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6592
CARNELL HUNNICUTT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Intervenor/Plaintiff,
versus
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; R. A.
YOUNG; S. K. YOUNG; A. P. HARVEY; T. YATES; R.
B. PHILLIPS,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
CHAPLAIN MITCHELL,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (CA-01-379-7)
Submitted: June 23, 2004 Decided: December 16, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carnell Hunnicutt, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent,
Assistant Attorney General, Susan Foster Barr, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Carnell Hunnicutt appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000)
and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Hunnicutt v. Virginia Dep’t of Corr., CA-01-379-7 (W.D.
Va. Mar. 19, 2004; Apr. 17, 2003). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -