United States v. Williams ( 2004 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6729
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JAMES ARTHUR WILLIAMS, a/k/a Fast,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman,
District Judge. (CR-02-32)
Submitted: December 16, 2004 Decided: December 20, 2004
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Arthur Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
James Arthur Williams appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United
States v. Williams, No. CR-02-32 (E.D. Va. Feb. 12 & filed Feb. 18;
entered Feb. 19, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -