United States v. McFadden ( 2003 )

PER CURIAM.

Edward M. McFadden appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to order the government to move for a Fed. R.Crim.P. 35(b) reduction in his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. McFadden, No. CR-98-164 (D.S.C. filed Apr. 11, 2002, entered Apr. 15, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.