Maddox v. Johnson ( 2010 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7081
MELVIN COREY MADDOX,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
GENE M. JOHNSON; FRED SHILLING; TRACY S. RAY; M. COLLINS;
L. MULLINS; B. OWENS; V. PHIPPS; STANLEY; H. SMITH; R.
KILGORE; S. CHURCH; L. YATES; T. MCCOY; A. MULLINS; J.
RASNICK; GARRY KENDRICK,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief
District Judge. (7:09-cv-00179-GEC-MFU)
Submitted: November 18, 2010 Decided: December 10, 2010
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Melvin Corey Maddox, Appellant Pro Se. Mark R. Davis, Assistant
Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER &
COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Melvin Corey Maddox appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Maddox v. Johnson, No. 7:09-cv-00179-GEC-MFU (W.D. Va.
July 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2