Fields v. United States ( 2003 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7011
RONALD FIELDS, a/k/a Kato,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; MICHAEL A.
SCHLOSSER; MICHAEL E. LEE; MARCIA G. SHEIN;
ROBERT H. EDMUNDS, JR.; DAVID B. SMITH; ANNA
MILLS WAGONER; RUSSELL A. ELIASON; JUDGE WARD;
CHIEF JUDGE TILLER; JUDGE WILLIAMS; JUDGE
KING; JUDGE GREGORY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen,
District Judge. (CA-03-350-1)
Submitted: October 22, 2003 Decided: November 12, 2003
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald Fields, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Ronald Fields appeals the district court’s order accepting the
magistrate judge’s recommendation and, under 28 U.S.C. §
1915(e)(2)(B) (2000), denying relief on Fields’ complaint, which
raised claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388(1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Fields v. United States, No. CA-03-350-1 (M.D.N.C. June 10, 2003).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2