Nagy v. Craven ( 2006 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7899
PAUL NAGY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
HOLLY B. ROGERS,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
JAMES CRAVEN, III,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief
District Judge. (CA-05-348-5-FL)
Submitted: February 10, 2006 Decided: March 7, 2006
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul Nagy, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Paul Nagy appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his Bivens complaint.* We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Nagy v. Rogers, No. CA-05-348-5-
FL (E.D.N.C. Nov. 1, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process. We deny Nagy’s motion to expedite as moot.
AFFIRMED
*
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
- 2 -