United States v. Joshua , 158 F. App'x 511 ( 2005 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 05-6652
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    JERRY GLENN JOSHUA,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District
    Judge. (CR-02-28; CA-04-531-2)
    Submitted:   December 22, 2005            Decided: December 29, 2005
    Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Jerry Glenn Joshua, Appellant Pro Se.     James Ashford Metcalfe,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Jerry Glenn Joshua, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal
    the district court’s order denying relief on his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2255
    (2000) motion.    An appeal may not be taken from the final order in
    a post-conviction proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge
    issues a certificate of appealability.        
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1)
    (2000).     A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a
    substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”         
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2) (2000).    A prisoner satisfies this standard by
    demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district
    court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable and
    that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are
    also debatable or wrong.    See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 
    537 U.S. 322
    ,
    336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484 (2000); Rose v.
    Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683 (4th Cir. 2001).        We have independently
    reviewed the record and conclude that Joshua has not made the
    requisite     showing.   Accordingly,   we   deny   a   certificate   of
    appealability and dismiss the appeal.    We grant Joshua’s motion to
    file an addendum to his informal brief.        We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-6652

Citation Numbers: 158 F. App'x 511

Filed Date: 12/29/2005

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021