Cato v. Bondurant , 203 F. App'x 523 ( 2006 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6795
JIMMIE LEE CATO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GREGORY BONDURANT, Officer; JOHNSON, Officer;
RONALD CORRIVEAU; HATFIELD, Officer; UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge.
(7:05-cv-00070-GEC)
Submitted: October 17, 2006 Decided: October 19, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jimmie Lee Cato, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant
United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Jimmie Lee Cato appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388(1971) and the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Cato v. Bondurant, No.
7:05-cv-00070-GEC (W.D. Va. Feb. 2 & Apr. 19, 2006). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -