Meeks v. Langley ( 2008 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7625
ALFONZO MEEKS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JAMES LANGLEY; ZEB T. HEATH, JR.; CARLTON B. JOYNER; HATTIE B.
PIMPONG,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III,
District Judge. (5:07-ct-03005)
Submitted: April 9, 2008 Decided: June 16, 2008
Before MICHAEL, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alfonzo Meeks, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Alfonzo Meeks appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
Meeks’ motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Meeks v. Langley, No.
5:07-ct-03005 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 4, 2007). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -