Thomas v. Fulton ( 2008 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1111
RANDY L. THOMAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
R. HARCOURT FULTON; JAMES HAMMOND,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 08-1292
RANDY L. THOMAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
R. HARCOURT FULTON; JAMES HAMMOND,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 08-1325
RANDY L. THOMAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
R. HARCOURT FULTON; JAMES HAMMOND,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior
District Judge. (3:07-cv-00200-GCM)
Submitted: June 26, 2008 Decided: July 22, 2008
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randy L. Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Sardar Mujeeb Shah-Khan, CITY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Charlotte, North Carolina; Mark Weston Johnson,
MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Randy L. Thomas appeals
the district court’s orders entered in his action filed pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), which (1) granted the motions to dismiss
filed by R. Harcourt Fulton and James Hammond (No. 08-1111);
(2) denied Thomas’ motions filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)
(No. 08-1292); and (3) reimposed a prefiling injunction on remand
(No. 08-1325). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Thomas v. Fulton, No. 3:07-cv-00200-GCM (W.D.N.C.
Dec. 11, 2007; Feb. 4, 2008; Feb. 13, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -