United States v. Sills ( 2008 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6704
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ROBERT EDWARD SILLS, a/k/a Bobby,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (2:03-cr-00148-JBF-5)
Submitted: August 14, 2008 Decided: August 21, 2008
Before MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Edward Sills, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Robert Edward Sills appeals the district court's orders
denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000), seeking a
reduction to his sentence based on an amendment to the Sentencing
Guidelines, and denying his amended motion. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we find the
district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motions.
See United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004)
(motion under § 3582(c) “is subject to the discretion of the
district court”); United States v. Legree, 205 F.3d 724, 727 (4th
Cir. 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2