Chapman v. Triplett ( 2005 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6483
DAVID CHAPMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DOCTOR TRIPLETT; AL CANNON, JR.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CA-04-363-8-18BI)
Submitted: August 12, 2005 Decided: August 29, 2005
Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Chapman, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Holmes Hood, Jr., Roy
Pearce Maybank, HOOD LAW FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina, Hugh
Willcox Buyck, BUYCK LAW FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina, Sandra
Jane Senn, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
David Chapman appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Chapman v.
Triplett, No. CA-04-363-8-18BI (D.S.C. Mar. 14, 2005). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -