In Re: Lewis v. , 144 F. App'x 350 ( 2005 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7211
In Re: DARRYL EUGENE LEWIS,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(CR-00-310)
Submitted: September 27, 2005 Decided: October 4, 2005
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darryl Eugene Lewis, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Darryl Eugene Lewis petitions for writ of mandamus. He
seeks an order directing the district court to follow certain
statutes and sentencing guidelines and to order his immediate
release from confinement.
Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has
a clear right to the relief sought. See In re First Fed. Sav. &
Loan Assn., 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Further, mandamus
is a drastic remedy and should only be used in extraordinary
circumstances. See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S.
394, 402 (1976); In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987).
Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. See In re
United Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979).
The relief sought by Lewis is not available by way of
mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant Lewis’s motion for leave
to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of
mandamus. We deny Lewis’s motion to expedite the appeal. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
- 2 -