In Re: Cofield v. ( 1999 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6577
In Re: KEENAN KESTER COFIELD,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(CA-96-2885-MJG)
Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 25, 1999
Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keenan Kester Cofield, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Keenan Kester Cofield has filed a petition for a writ of man-
damus seeking this Court to review an order of the district court
denying his motion to remand. In his mandamus petition, Cofield
fails to establish that he has a clear right to the relief sought.
See In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n., 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th
Cir. 1988); see also In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.
1987). We therefore grant Cofield’s motion to proceed in forma
pauperis but deny his petition for a writ of mandamus. We deny the
motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED.
2