United States v. Jackson ( 2009 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7550
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
HAROLD STEVEN JACKSON, a/k/a Ears,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:06-cr-00306-PJM-1)
Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 30, 2009
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harold Steven Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Deborah A. Johnston,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Harold Steven Jackson appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence filed
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the
record and find the district court did not abuse its discretion
in denying the motion. See United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d
469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (motion under § 3582(c) “is subject to
the discretion of the district court”); United States v. Legree,
205 F.3d 724, 727 (4th Cir. 2000). Thus, we affirm the district
court’s order for the reasons stated there. See United
States v. Jackson, No. 8:06-cr-00306-PJM-1 (D. Md. Aug. 10,
2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2