Deepak Rajani v. The Travelers Indemnity Co ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                                UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 11-228
    DEEPAK RAJANI; TRAVELLERS.COM,
    Petitioners,
    v.
    THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Permission to Appeal.
    (1:10-cv-00448-LO-JFA)
    Submitted:   November 18, 2011               Decided:   December 15, 2011
    Before KING, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Deepak Rajani, Petitioner Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Deepak Rajani has filed a petition for permission to
    appeal numerous district court orders under Fed. R. App. P. 5.
    This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
     (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral
    orders, 
    28 U.S.C. § 1292
     (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
    Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 
    337 U.S. 541
    , 545-46 (1949).                           The
    orders      Rajani   seeks   to   contest       on   appeal    are    neither      final
    orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders, and we
    therefore lack jurisdiction to review the orders.                      Accordingly,
    we   deny    Rajani’s   petition     for       permission     to   appeal    and    deny
    Rajani’s various pending motions filed in the appeal as moot.
    We   dispense    with   oral      argument      because     the    facts    and    legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    PETITION DENIED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-0228

Filed Date: 12/15/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/22/2014