Yassir Mahmoudi v. Eric Holder, Jr. ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                                 UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 11-1698
    YASSIR MAHMOUDI,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
    Appeals.
    Submitted:    January 4, 2012                 Decided:   January 10, 2012
    Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Chester L.     Smith, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Petitioner.
    Tony West,      Assistant Attorney General, Linda S. Wernery,
    Assistant     Director,   Thankful  T.  Vanderstar,  Office  of
    Immigration    Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
    Washington,   D.C., for Respondent.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Yassir     Mahmoudi,     a    native          and    citizen     of   Morocco,
    petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
    Appeals    (“Board”)      dismissing     his     appeal         from   the   immigration
    judge’s    denial    of    his    motion       for    a    continuance.           We   have
    reviewed    the   record    and    find    no        abuse      of   discretion.       See
    Lendo v. Gonzales, 
    493 F.3d 439
    , 441 (4th Cir. 2007) (setting
    forth standard of review).          We further find that Mahmoudi cannot
    demonstrate a violation of his due process rights as he fails to
    show the requisite prejudice.                  See Anim v. Mukasey, 
    535 F.3d 243
    , 256 (4th Cir. 2008).          Accordingly, we deny the petition for
    review substantially for the reasons stated by the Board.                              See
    In re: Mahmoudi (B.I.A. June 17, 2011).                         We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    PETITION DENIED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-1698

Filed Date: 1/10/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/22/2014