-
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 98-4744 GARY MICHAEL ALLEN, a/k/a Philly, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-96-986) Submitted: November 16, 1999 Decided: December 20, 1999 Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. _________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. _________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Michael S. Seekings, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. J. Rene Josey, United States Attorney, Robert H. Bickerton, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. _________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). OPINION PER CURIAM: Gary Allen appeals from a district court judgment order entered pursuant to a jury verdict finding him guilty of conspiring to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute cocaine, in violation of
21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) & 846 (1994). On appeal, Allen challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction, and the district court's decision to attribute over 50 grams of cocaine to him at sen- tencing. We must sustain the jury's verdict if there is substantial evi- dence, taking the view most favorable to the Government, to support it. See Glasser v. United States,
315 U.S. 60, 80 (1942). The district court's calculation of the quantity of drugs attributable to a defendant is reviewed for clear error. See United States v. Lamarr,
75 F.3d 964, 972 (4th Cir. 1996). The record discloses that Allen's conviction was supported by overwhelming evidence. Contrary to Allen's claims that he did not participate in a large drug ring operating in Beaufort, South Carolina between 1994 and 1996, but rather merely purchased drugs from some of the conspiracy's participants, numerous co-defendants testi- fied that Allen participated by providing customers to the leaders of the conspiracy, delivering drugs to those customers, and delivering proceeds of drug sales to dealers in exchange for payment. This testi- mony also reflects Allen's involvement with far more than 50 grams of cocaine. There was evidence that one supplier fronted Allen a quar- ter of an ounce of crack each day for a period of a year and a half. A member of the task force that investigated the drug ring testified that Allen admitted to cooking three ounces of crack for this same supplier. Another dealer testified that Allen sold nine ounces of crack for him over a two month period. And various other witnesses testi- fied to Allen's regular involvement with the conspiracy over most of its duration. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment order of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argu- ment would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Document Info
Docket Number: 98-4744
Filed Date: 12/20/1999
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 10/30/2014