Tembi v. Ashcroft ( 2003 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1038
ESTHER N. TEMBI,
Petitioner,
versus
JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A75-342-852)
Submitted: October 6, 2003 Decided: October 22, 2003
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Danielle L.C. Beach-Oswald, NOTO & OSWALD, P.C., Washington, D.C.,
for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General,
Mark C. Walters, Assistant Director, Mary Jane Candaux, Senior
Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Esther Nuk Tembi, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions
for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
(“Board”) denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have
reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board
did not abuse its discretion in denying Tembi’s motion to reopen.
See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2003); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314,
323-24 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review on the
reasoning of the Board. See In re: Tembi, No. A75-342-852 (B.I.A.
Dec. 9, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2