United States v. De Antoni ( 1996 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 95-7424
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    ANTHONY JOSEPH DE ANTONI, a/k/a Tony Dean,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert N. Maletz, Senior Judge, sitting
    by designation. (CR-89-462-HAR, CA-95-2181-HAR)
    Submitted:   February 7, 1996          Decided:     February 22, 1996
    Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Anthony Joseph De Antoni, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew George Warrens
    Norman, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
    motion to correct and/or modify his sentence. We have reviewed the
    record and find no reversible error. Appellant alleged that imposi-
    tion of his sentence without parole under 
    21 U.S.C. § 848
     (1988)
    was illegal. The motion was properly denied because imposition of
    the sentence without parole is mandatory under 
    21 U.S.C. § 848
    (c)
    (1988). In addition, Appellant alleged that his sentence should be
    vacated because the Government made a Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion
    to reduce Appellant's sentence from eleven to ten years without the
    presence of Appellant in court. No error was committed when the
    district court granted the motion for reduction of sentence in
    accordance with former Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) because Appellant
    made the motion himself without opposition from the Government. We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 95-7424

Filed Date: 2/22/1996

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021