United States v. Clay ( 1996 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7380
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
EUGENE E. CLAY, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Richard B. Kellam, Senior
District Judge. (CR-92-5-NN, CA-95-79-4)
Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 1, 1996
Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eugene E. Clay, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Cathy Ellen Krinick, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the
district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
Clay, Nos. CR-92-5-NN; CA-95-79-4 (E.D. Va. Aug. 14, 1995). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2