United States v. Robert Rushie ( 2013 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7296
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ROBERT EVERTON RUSHIE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:00-cr-00396-NCT-1)
Submitted: October 7, 2013 Decided: October 21, 2013
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Everton Rushie, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael
Hamilton, Michael Francis Joseph, Angela Hewlett Miller,
Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Robert Everton Rushie appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motions for
reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Rushie, No. 1:00-cr-
00396-NCT-1 (M.D.N.C. May 30, 2013). We deny Rushie’s motion to
appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2