United States v. Goldsmith , 194 F. App'x 105 ( 2006 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7354
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LUTHER T. GOLDSMITH,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (CR-01-29)
Submitted: August 4, 2006 Decided: August 15, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Luther T. Goldsmith, Appellant Pro Se. Nicholas Stephan Altimari,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Luther T. Goldsmith appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his motion to modify his sentence under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Goldsmith’s
§ 3582 motion for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Goldsmith, No. CR-01-29 (E.D. Va. July 18, 2005). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -