Richard Peamon v. Leslie Gradet ( 2012 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1998
RICHARD PEAMON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LESLIE GRADET, Clerk of the Court; PETER B. KRAUSER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District
Judge. (1:12-cv-01241-WDQ)
Submitted: December 20, 2012 Decided: December 26, 2012
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard Peamon, Appellant Pro Se. Hugh Scott Curtis, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Richard Peamon seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint
alleging an error in the docketing of his state court action * and
the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)
motion to alter or amend the judgment. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave
to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. Peamon v.
Gradet, No. 1:12-cv-01241-WDQ (D. Md. July 12 & Aug. 2, 2012).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
*
That error was corrected.
2