Blackston v. Vogrin ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 10-6736
    THEOPHILUS BLACKSTON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    STEPHEN VOGRIN, Individually and Officially,
    Defendant - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
    District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior
    District Judge. (2:10-cv-00014-REM-JSK)
    Submitted:   November 30, 2010            Decided:   December 6, 2010
    Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Theophilus Blackston, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Theophilus Blackston filed a 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     (2006)
    complaint alleging that a prosecutor violated his privacy rights
    by revealing medical information during the sentencing hearing
    in Blackston’s criminal prosecution.          A prosecutor is a quasi-
    judicial officer who enjoys absolute immunity when performing
    prosecutorial functions as an advocate for the state.              Imbler v.
    Pachtman, 
    424 U.S. 409
    , 430-31 (1976).            We therefore affirm the
    district   court’s     order   accepting    the     recommendation   of   the
    magistrate judge and denying relief on Blackston’s complaint.
    We   dispense   with   oral    argument   because    the   facts   and   legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-6736

Filed Date: 12/6/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021