In Re: Bailey v. ( 2005 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7436
In Re: JAMES CLAUDE BAILEY,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Extraordinary Writ under the All Writs Act
(CA-00-21-RAJ)
Submitted: October 20, 2005 Decided: October 31, 2005
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Claude Bailey, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
James Claude Bailey petitions for an extraordinary writ
pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (2000). We find
that relief is not warranted, and we therefore deny the petition.
We grant Bailey leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny his
“motion for expedited response” as moot. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal arguments are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
significantly aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
- 2 -