Haynesworth v. SC Dep't of Corrections ( 2010 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6717
ALPHONSO HAYNESWORTH,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; MICHAEL
LAUBSHIRE; ROBERT WARD; JON OZMINT; WILLIE EAGLETON;
REDFEARN MILLER; ANNIE SELLARS; BEVERLY BAKER; ANTHONY
WHILTINGTON; PAMELA D. MCDOWELL; OFFICER DRIGGERS; OFFICER
JOSEPH; G. ROGERS, Captain; K. LEAR, Sergeant; SERGEANT
THOMAS; MS. THOMAS; A. GRAVES; B. MILLER, Mrs.,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (8:10-cv-00507-CMC)
Submitted: November 18, 2010 Decided: November 30, 2010
Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alphonso Haynesworth, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Alphonso Haynesworth appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006)
complaint. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Haynesworth v. S.C. Dep’t of Corr., No. 8:10-
cv-00507-CMC (D.S.C. Apr. 30, 2010). We deny Haynesworth’s
motion for an order to show cause and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
The district court’s order is a final, appealable order.
See Young v. Nickols, 413 F.3d 416, 418 (4th Cir. 2005).
2