Crump v. Christie ( 2007 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 07-7260
    THOMAS A. CRUMP,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MARK C. CHRISTIE, in his personal capacity as
    Commissioner, State Corporation Commission;
    THEODORE V. MORRISON, JR., in his personal
    capacity as Commissioner, State Corporation
    Commission; JUDITH WILLIAMS JAGDMANN, in her
    personal capacity as Commissioner, State
    Corporation Commission; LARRY E. DURBIN, in
    his    personal    capacity   as    Assistant
    Commissioner, Customer Service, Department of
    Taxation; MICHAEL G. FOJTIK, in his personal
    capacity as Senior Auditor, Department of
    Taxation, Tobacco Unit,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.   James R. Spencer, Chief
    District Judge. (3:07-cv-00244-JRS)
    Submitted:   December 20, 2007         Decided:     December 28, 2007
    Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Thomas A. Crump, Appellant Pro Se. A. Ann Berkebile, Philip Reed
    DeHass, STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF VIRGINIA, Richmond,
    Virginia; Flora Townes Hezel, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
    VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    - 2 -
    PER CURIAM:
    Thomas      A.   Crump   appeals   the   district    court’s    order
    dismissing his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
    the record and find no reversible error.             Accordingly, we affirm
    for the reasons stated by the district court.               Crump v. Christie,
    No. 3:07-cv-00244-JRS (E.D. Va. Aug. 7, 2007).                 We deny Crump’s
    motion to recuse judges of this court that smoke from this case.
    We   dispense   with    oral   argument   because     the    facts   and   legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    - 3 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-7260

Filed Date: 12/28/2007

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021