United States v. Sorto ( 1999 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7309
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MARIO SORTO,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CR-96-251-A, CA-99-854-AM)
Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 22, 1999
Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mario Sorto, Appellant Pro Se. Rebeca Hidalgo Bellows, Assistant
United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Mario Sorto seeks to appeal the district court’s orders deny-
ing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999),
and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and
dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See
United States v. Sorto, Nos. CR-96-251-A; CA-99-854-AM (E.D. Va.
July 1 & Sept. 9, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2